Legends of Western Cinema Week | The English {2022}

{The Plot}

In 1890, British aristocrat Cornelia Locke (Emily Blunt) arrives in the lawless American West as a woman on a mission:  to find the man who killed her son and make him wish he hadn't.  She crosses paths with Eli Whipp (Chaske Spencer), a Pawnee ex-Cavalry scout.  They join forces and set out to reach the offender before his henchmen reach them. 


{My Thoughts}

If I had to sum up my thoughts on The English in one word, that word would be 'crammed.'  There's a lot going on, here — a little too much, I think.  Colonization, rape, child loss, murder, racism, cattle rustling, vengeance, late-stage syphilis . . . it's A Lot.  And while everything is more than deserving of a full-fledged narrative exploration, that's an exploration that the constraints of a six-episode format don't really allow.  The show succeeds in many areas, but would have benefited significantly from either a pared-down thematic agenda or an expanded runtime. 

That's not to say, however, that the Western's thematic endeavors are ineffective simply because they are incomplete.  Quite the contrary:  The English makes it clear that it came to make you Feel Something™, and it succeeds.  I was emotional, Jeeves. I was, indeed.  The dynamic between Cornelia and Eli is the lynchpin of the entire story, and if Blunt and Spencer didn't work so beautifully together, or didn't turn in such magnificent individual performances, that story would fall much flatter than it does.  They make you feel for the characters — BOY, DO THEY — and, for me, it was worth watching the show at least once just to see them.


*SPOILERS*  On the other hand, The English does end by employing one of my fictional pet peeves:  the "star-crossed lovers are torn apart by inescapable and insurmountable obstacles (but the obstacles are actually Highly escapable and Extremely surmountable)" schtick.  Eli and Cornelia part ways after the final showdown with Melmont because somebody convinces them that they'll never get away with it if they stick together — that they both have to "disappear":  Eli into the dust clouds of the "unsettled" American West, Cornelia into the stuffy mansions of Victorian England.  And apparently they can't disappear together or Melmont's cronies will be able to track them because they knew they were traveling together previously.  But, like . . . the story never gives a good reason why?  Sure, a white British woman and a Native ex-Army officer would have attracted attention, but if Melmont's people already knew to be looking out for them, they'd be a target alone OR together.  Plus, they've successfully evaded Melmont & Co. for six episodes, now, so . . . what gives?  It reads as a disingenuous attempt to wring even more heartache out of the audience, and it's unworthy of the rest of the show, and it ticks me off.

Additionally, while the ethics of revenge stories are dubious at best to begin with, I do have to point out that if you are going to write a story about a woman traveling across the world to exact vengeance on the man who raped her and infected both her and her child with a fatal illness, then it seems Not Quite The Thing to have someone else actually exact said vengeance.  *END OF SPOILERS*


Back to technicalities:

The story progresses in a non-linear fashion, so things don't start to make much sense until the last couple of episodes.  Before then, we ping-pong between Cornelia's and Eli's present-day journey and a lot of flashbacks that tease plot points and introduce integral characters without explaining how they're connected.  The messy structure would have annoyed me, actually, had I not been so satisfied by the characters in the present-day story, but the show does a good job of building on the mystery surrounding the circumstances of Cornelia's vendetta.  I can't remember for certain, but I believe the script may have actually identified her enemy by name from the beginning, yet the show is structured in such a way that you don't (or I didn't) connect the dots until close to the end.  You start to wonder exactly how many people were embroiled in the death of her son, whether there's a case of mistaken identity somewhere, etc., and the uncertainty helps to propel the story forward.

I will warn you that the show opens with a rather maudlin voice-over, but that sentimentality is, if troubling, at least brief.  The script quickly loses its saccharine edge while maintaining its emotional intensity, and things "heat up," narratively speaking, pretty rapidly.

Speaking of which, the violence is severe and occasionally startling, but I don't think I'd term it gratuitous. The only real excess I would point out, again, would be in the sheer variety of violence, particularly on a more thematic level. I hate having to call the show a trauma dump, but that's essentially what it is.  In fact, if I had to describe The English with one gif, this would be it:


The syphilis plotline grows increasingly disturbing, as the show utilizes the gruesome reality of the untreated disease to inject a not insignificant amount of medical horror.  Parts, in fact, were so extreme that they seemed far-fetched — but then, I've never studied the illness, so it might be perfectly realistic, for all I know.

I've already mentioned the two lead performances, but I have to circle back to Cornelia.  I always love what Emily Blunt creates, and her work in The English is no exception.  She evokes Cornelia so masterfully — the ash and flame of her, the love and rage, the goodness and bloodlust.  She's "the fire and the flood," as the song goes, and she's wonderful.  (P.S.  You know one of the things I loved most about Blunt's performance?  How easily she allowed Cornelia to cry.  So many times, "strong"/angry characters are portrayed as stoic, unable to weep, etc. and so forth.  But not this time.  This character has a heck of a lot to cry about, gosh dang it, and the show gives her space to do so.  She bears witness to the devastation around and within her by allowing her tears to fall freely, and I appreciate that so much.  It was such a refreshing change of pace.)

Spencer's Eli is also excellent, and there's so much to consider about his treatment and contribution within the story, etc., but I don't have the energy to do that in this post.  I may be talking a little bit more about him later this week, so we'll see.  Suffice it to say, for now, that his is an incredibly worthy character that deserves much more attention than I'm giving him here.

I haven't yet touched on the supporting performances (all of which are noteworthy, as well) or on the cinematography (which is stunning), but, alas, I must close for now.  However, I'll leave you with this GORGEOUS fanvid of Cornelia and Eli so that you can be as emotional as I am.  *sniffles*



Have you watched The English?


Comments

  1. I have not seen this one (as is the case, alas, with a lot of Westerns), but it looks rather gorgeous, visually.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It IS gorgeous visually -- bold and saturated and cinematic.

      Delete
  2. Emily Blunt is a queen and the world must recognize this fact.

    For some reason, I had absolutely no idea "The English" was a TV miniseries?? I was convinced it was a movie?? I don't really know where I got that idea, but I think I saw a trailer for it at some point and my brain went "ah yes, a female-led Western movie, we need more of those in the world." Still, a female-led Western TV series is also excellent, even if it does Trauma Dump like nobody's business.

    When you mentioned the trope of "star-crossed lovers being torn apart by insurmountable odds that are actually extremely surmountable," I immediately assumed you meant they get back together again--like, they're torn apart for THE DRAMA but then they reunite and live happily ever after. It just dawned on me that is probably not what you meant and now I'm Sad TM.

    Great review as always, my dear!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Truth.

      Well, to be fair, I consider miniseries movies, so, in a way . . . xD

      Hehehe . . . IF ONLY that's what I meant . . . IF ONLY.

      Thank you, love!

      Delete
  3. Great review! I enjoyed this series, particularly Eli's character. He made the whole series for me and is now one of my favorite characters. I could have done without the syphilis gruesomeness as a subplot, though, but it does make the story different. I didn't have a problem with them parting ways at the end. I think it would have been crueler to keep them together given what was going to happen to her, but that could just be me, LOL!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That comment was mine. Blogger never lets me stay logged in any more with comments, and it drives me crazy.

      Delete
    2. Thanks! (Why is Blogger like this?! It won't notify me of comments on my posts anymore, so I always have to pull up the blog itself to check. Seems like the interface is having trouble these days.)

      Eli is wonderful and he's 100% one of my favorite Western heroes, now. Same, could have done without the extremes of the syphilis stuff -- it just started to seem a bit Much.

      Lol! Well, hey, different strokes, as they say. xD

      Delete
  4. Oooh... I can't remember why I wrote off seeing this, but after reading your review I want to see it again. I loved Emily Blunt in The Young Victoria, and I am excited by the prospect of a Western with a Pawnee protagonist. But more than that, I'm interested in the storyline, which I didn't know as much about before. It does sound a bit like an extreme trainwreck (Thomas Hardy, anyone?), maybe I'll just watch with a grain of salt. ;)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's pretty stylized, so, may not be everyone's thing. But, that said, I do think it's worth a watch even for Blunt fans who don't have any interest in the plot, genre, etc., so since you DO have an interest, I'd definitely recommend giving it a try. ;) I'd be very interested to hear what you think of it if you ever do so!

      Delete
  5. Oddly, I really haven't heard of this before. I find Emily Blunt charming in a pugnacious way, so... I might watch this if I happen across it.

    That second spoiler peeve of yours, though, will probably annoy me ENDLESSLY.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And she is at her most pugnacious in this one, so, definitely worth giving it a shot.

      Yeahhhhhh, it's . . . an Odd choice. Narratively, I kind of get why they did it the way they did it in the end, but still.

      Delete
  6. I haven't seen this, but Emily Blunt is awesome so I'll have to look for it. It sounds like a busy film. :-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, it's very busy. xD But Emily Blunt is awesome, like you said!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Comments make my day. Seriously. I'd be so happy if you commented. :)

I've gotten really bad about replying in a timely manner, but it's always my intention to do so eventually. (Even though it doesn't always happen. ;))

Popular posts from this blog

Lark Rise to Candleford, Seasons 1-4 {review}

My Dream Cast for a Live-Action Remake of 'The Incredibles'

Romeo and Juliet (2013) {review}