Tuesday, August 2, 2016

Legends of Western Cinema Week / / The Searchers {by Alan Le May}

"It never occurred to them that their search was stretching out into a great extraordinary feat of endurance; an epic of hope without faith, of fortitude without reward, of stubbornness past all limits of reason.  They simply kept on, doing the next thing, because they always had one more place to go, following out one more forlorn-hope try."

You'll be so proud of me, guys.  I finally finished an actual Western book.  I've seen several, but I don't think I'd ever read a Western novel all the way through.  I just haven't picked up that many, and the content I've run into has sort of put a damper on our relationship, as a very wise man in black once put it.  (Well, maybe that Dear America book about the wagon train counts…and then there's A Lantern in Her Hand and Love Comes Softly and the like...)  Anyway, a week or two ago, I did it--I read a no-doubt-about-it, true Western:  The Searchers by Alan Le May. I'm accordingly here to review it.

The plot follows Amos Edwards and Mart Pauley as they embark on a relentless search for two girls abducted after a Comanche raid--Amos' nieces and Mart's adopted sisters.  And it sure doesn't waste any time: by the fourth chapter, the horrific attack has happened, and the journey is about to begin.

I don't really know what to say.  On the one hand, the writing was just so. darn. good. …but confound it, was there ever a bright moment in this book??  If there was, I think I missed it.  The heart-wrenching efforts of the men to recover Lucy and Debbie, *SPOILERS* especially when they discover that it was too late in Lucy's case, *END OF SPOILERS* stretch on…and on…and on…not in a boring, oh-my-goodness-will-you-just-write-something-else sort of way, but in an extremely tragic and compelling exploration of human endurance and all that jazz.

"'This is rough country…it's a country knows how to scour a human man right off the face of itself.  A Texan is nothing but a human man way out on a limb.  This year, and next year, and maybe for a hundred more.  But I don't think it'll be forever.  Someday this country will be a fine good place to be.  Maybe it needs our bones in the ground before that time can come.'"

Since Amos and Mart are the two that we really get to know, they're the only characters I'll specifically
touch on.  Amos is a bit of a puzzle to me--it's not hard to figure out that he's an iconically hardened man of the West, but it IS hard to figure out what lies underneath that hardness.  He has a heart, one that's very much alive and kicking, that's for sure.  But what exactly resides in that heart, I can't fully make out--which I sort of like.  Eventually, it becomes clear that he's continuing this quest that pushes the limits of sanity not solely--or even primarily--to recover Debbie.  His goal is to claim revenge on every Comanche he can corner.  The darkness of this hatred, thoroughly understandable though it is, is rather disturbing, but in the end I think good triumphed over evil in the person of Amos Edwards.  (ALSO.  CAN WE TALK ABOUT THE WILL AMOS SHOWS MART AFTER MART DELIVERS HIS ULTIMATUM.  FEELS.)

Le May delves more deeply into Mart's psyche, so it's easier to get a firm grip on his personality:  what makes him tick, what he's looking for, the pain and the strength in him, etc.  You really feel for Mart in his search for Debbie, because ultimately it's a search for belonging.  Debbie is all that's left of the only family Mart ever knew; she represents home.  Perhaps, in a way, Mart feels that if he can rescue Debbie, he'll make amends for how he couldn't save his blood family when he was a frightened toddler abandoned--for his own safe-keeping--in the brush of the prairie.

Though I could have used a tiny bit more levity somewhere in the whole entire book *ahem*, it really was an outstandingly well-crafted story.  Mr. Le May's writing was sparse where need be and vivid where need be.  I really loved his style.  As Emma said in regards to Larry McCurtry, "he knows how to drive a story, and doesn't waste time with the unimportant stuff."  There was the perfect blend of ornamentation and just plain telling the story--taut enough to keep the story moving without throwing in superfluous soliloquizing or description of the landscape, yet also philosophical enough to keep away from Ernest Hemingway extremes.  I approve ;)  And despite the extremely weighty subject matter, he included injections of that classic Western humor--sardonic, tongue-in-cheek, and delightfully wry.

The content is not actually too bad in this one, considering the storyline, but it's certainly still there.  I wouldn't recommend this to younger readers, on the most basic level, because of the thematic material--we're dealing with two young girls who have been kidnapped by Comanche braves, plus their family was slaughtered by their captors.  So, you know, there is a good deal of discussion about rape, scalping, and various other forms of mutilations enacted in the hostilities between the Indians and the settlers.  I think that aspect of the book is handled quite tastefully, actually, because it never gets too graphic, but it never sugarcoats the trauma either.  The content that bugged me can be found in the language and in the brief sexual coarseness.  G-----n was used a bit too often for my comfort:  I can get past it once, twice, or even thrice in a story, but beyond that I begin to get pretty uncomfortable.  There's no real excuse for it, and there is only rarely an understandable reason for using it.  Also, I could have done without the vulgar innuendo when Mart "buys" a wife--even though nothing ever actually happens--and I definitely could have done without the tequila-and-dancing-girl incident.  (Basically, Mart gets drunk at a bar and spends the night with one of the "entertaining girls," though he most likely would not have if it weren't for the fact that he was intoxicated.  Still, alcohol or no alcohol, not okay.)  Ordinarily I wouldn't keep reading after that, I don't think, but I was so far into the book that I was bound and determined to see it through.

*I'm now going to talk briefly about the end, and I'll close with a quote therefrom, so beware of the ensuing SPOILERS!*

I really wasn't sure how the story was going to end, because the book has such an attitude of--I don't want to say 'pessimism,' but more of an unrelenting realism to it, that I just couldn't be sure one way or the other.  The conclusion was different than I was imagining, however it ended, but it was GOOD.  It was realistic but still hopeful.  All in all, I'm glad I read this book.  It left me with a not-altogether-unpleasant sense of slight melancholy--or, shall we say, solemnity--but also of hope, as I said.  And now, the promised concluding quote:

"He thought she was asleep, until she spoke, a whisper against his chest.  'I remember,' she said in a strangely mixed tongue of Indian-English.  'I remember it all.  But you the most.  I remember how hard I loved you.'"


12 comments:

  1. Wait--is this the book that John Wayne's "The Searchers" was based on? I'm asking because I seem to remember that, in that movie, John Wayne's character was searching for the abducted girl in order to kill her? (Although *SPOILERS* he changed his mind later *END OF SPOILER*?) Because it doesn't sound like that's what these characters--Amos and Mart--are trying to do. So I guess I'm just curious what's the relationship (if any) between this book and the John Wayne movie.

    I love the ending quote. It's sad. But it's beautiful. *sniffles*

    You know, I read a Western last year that I really, really loved--"To Tame A Land" by Louis L'Amour. I don't remember if I've ever recommended it to you before? I thought it was an amazing novel--definitely grim in some places, yes, but not brutal. And the characters were JUST. SO. COOL.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep, that's the one. From what I understand, John Wayne plays Ethan, who's really Amos, except they changed his name for the movie. In the book, Amos' original thought is that it'd be sort of a "mercy" to kill Debbie if they found her, because she'd already have been "used" among the Indians either by means of rape or by marrying her off to a brave...or at least she would be already inculcated into the Indian culture. (Needless to say, yeah, that doesn't end up happening.)

      Right?! The writing was so beautiful and evocative.

      I really need to read something by Louis L'Amour! (I actually have one, The Proving Trail, but I haven't read it yet.) I keep hearing that he's awesome! So you liked it? I think you MIGHT have mentioned that to me before...maybe not...I dunno :P Ooh, I must keep my eyes open for it!

      Delete
    2. I really did love it--not just as a Western novel, but as a novel, period. I have a HUGE crush on the hero, Rye Tyler, not gonna lie :-) He's so cool and level-headed and logical, and yet deep down inside he's a sweet puppy dog just begging for a family to love him . . . Okay, I'll stop now before this comment turns into romantic mush and ruins my reputation ;-) But I did love the book, very, very much. And L'Amour's writing style is AWESOME.

      Delete
    3. Ooooh…I must meet this Rye Tyler ;) (His name is awesome!) Haha, I loved how you put that: "I'll stop now before this comment turns into romantic mush and ruins my reputation." SAME.

      Delete
  2. Intriguing! It does sound like they stuck fairly quickly to the book when they made the movie, just from what you describe here. Aside from changing Amos' name to Ethan, I mean. Great review!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep, from all I can gather, they did. (I find the name change odd, though: Ethan was actually the name of Amos' brother who was killed, Lucy's and Debbie's father.) Thanks!

      Delete
  3. Great review! I've seen the movie but haven't read the book. It's interesting what you say about the book delving deeper into Martin's character—in the movie his character seems a little under-developed, maybe because most of the focus is on Ethan/Amos. (One thing about it, though: the color cinematography is absolutely gorgeous.)

    As someone who loves reading Westerns, but is also picky about content, I can give you some advice: read older books! L'Amour is pretty good in that respect; the language, if any, is milder, and mature subjects are usually handled in a tasteful way. (But I have to say I don't recommend starting with The Proving Trail, which has one of the most confusing plots I've ever read!.) And there's other, even earlier authors I like even better: B.M. Bower, Henry Herbert Knibbs, Eugene Manlove Rhodes, Max Brand, etc. In other words, I could swamp a Western beginner with recommendations. :)

    ...Oh, and I've written some myself, too! :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks! I want to see the movie--if it's got John Wayne, it's 96% certain that I'll like it :P Oh, interesting! I guess they did that because they wanted to focus more on Ethan, like you said? I mean, he is a fascinating character, so I guess I can understand :D

      Oh! Thank you SOO much! It really is a bit of a struggle--wanting to read Westerns but being picky about the content, like you say. So I appreciate the advice! (Haha, oops, p'raps I'll wait on that one, then.) Thanks! I'd never heard of those authors, so I'll definitely keep my eyes open for them :)

      And yes, I've heard great things about your writing from Hamlette! I have to read some of your Westerns! :D

      Delete
    2. You're welcome! Are you on Goodreads, by the way? I've rated/shelved lots of Westerns there, including my favorites.

      And I have a giveaway for one of my own books running in my Western Week post right now, if you're interested! :)

      Delete
    3. I am! You'll probably be getting a friend request from me, soon :D

      Thank you so much! I'm so behind on blogging, and especially this Western Week, that I think I missed your post completely. I'm so sorry! I'll definitely be trying to get over to your blog soon, though--both for the post you did and because I'm not sure if I've ever actually been over there...which is a crying shame!

      Delete
  4. This sounds, actually, super amazing. And like the kind of thing I would really get into. (Why do I love bleak, depressing westerns so much?) Thanks for the review!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you would like it. It's definitely bleak, but it's so GOOD. Read it :D

      Delete

It appears that you're about to leave a comment. I think you should know that if you do, I will giggle and smile and be delirious with joy, and then I'll stalk you to find out whether or not you have a blog *ahem*.

…All that's to say, please comment! :D